Casey Anthony, the Latest Poster Girl for the Pro-Abortion Crowd
October 25th 2008 15:13
Move over Susan Smith, Andrea Yates and all the other "mothers" who murdered their children. The pro-abortion movement has a new heroine. Casey Anthony. Her beautiful little daughter Caylee has been missing since last June and is presumed dead. Forensic evidence has proven that a decomposing body was in the trunk of her car. The hair found was that of little Caylee. Chloroform was there, too. She drove around with her dead child in the trunk until the stench began to bother her and then dumped the little body as easily as she would have taken out the trash.
I'm sure some of you are thinking that comparing these three monsters to women who murder their babies before they're born is wrong. I submit to you that it is exactly the same thing, folks. Look at it logically for a minute, O.K.?
What's the usual excuse a "woman" uses when she wants an abortion? "I'm not ready to have a baby." Or maybe, "I can't handle the pressure of raising a child." Or perhaps, "A kid would cut into my life too much (no more partying, drugs, casual sex, career, etc.)" Or "My boyfriend (or husband) doesn't want kids."
So we have Susan Smith, her excuse for killing her sons was that they would interfere with her romance and she preferred them dead to alive. Andrea Yates was under too much "pressure" to let her five children live. Now Casey Anthony is using the Susan Smith excuse, too. These females are monsters, no two ways about it, folks. The pr0-abortion crowd will undoubtedly say (as they always do) that it would have been better if these monsters had murdered the children before they were born. The wise and sensible "choice?" Sorry, that doesn't wash, even for asecond. Same kids, just as dead. Murdered by their "mothers."
So all you pro-abortion people should be celebrating their "wise and sensible choices" about killing their children. You like "late term abortions" after all, don't you? Does it really matter to you if the baby is killed on the way through the birth canal or after the baby has already come out? Obviously not, since it doesn't matter to Barack Hussein Obama and he is your candidate, right?
I'm sure some of you are thinking that comparing these three monsters to women who murder their babies before they're born is wrong. I submit to you that it is exactly the same thing, folks. Look at it logically for a minute, O.K.?
What's the usual excuse a "woman" uses when she wants an abortion? "I'm not ready to have a baby." Or maybe, "I can't handle the pressure of raising a child." Or perhaps, "A kid would cut into my life too much (no more partying, drugs, casual sex, career, etc.)" Or "My boyfriend (or husband) doesn't want kids."
So we have Susan Smith, her excuse for killing her sons was that they would interfere with her romance and she preferred them dead to alive. Andrea Yates was under too much "pressure" to let her five children live. Now Casey Anthony is using the Susan Smith excuse, too. These females are monsters, no two ways about it, folks. The pr0-abortion crowd will undoubtedly say (as they always do) that it would have been better if these monsters had murdered the children before they were born. The wise and sensible "choice?" Sorry, that doesn't wash, even for asecond. Same kids, just as dead. Murdered by their "mothers."
So all you pro-abortion people should be celebrating their "wise and sensible choices" about killing their children. You like "late term abortions" after all, don't you? Does it really matter to you if the baby is killed on the way through the birth canal or after the baby has already come out? Obviously not, since it doesn't matter to Barack Hussein Obama and he is your candidate, right?
| 45 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog
Comment by Lester Caudill
Round Politics
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief