More Sheehan Shenanigans
August 11th 2007 02:23
Have you heard the latest weepy, sobby attemp from Cindy Sheehan to make herself important and famous? She had a press conferrence in San Fransisco and informed everyone (who cared) that she seriously plans to run against Nasty Pelosi in '08. Great we get the chance to trade one screeching liberal for another! Lucky us.
Sheehan says, between sobs, that she is planning to run "for all the Iraqi and Afghan people killed in this terrible war." Right... those poor, dear innocents who killed her son? That makes sense, doesn't it? She wants to use her son's death to climb to fame and fortune and also use those who killed him as her excuse for running for office. Really smart. No contradictions there, huh, folks?
Her main purpose to unseat Nasty Pelosi is so that she can arrange to impeach Pres. Bush. Has anyone told her that if she's lucky enough (and the country is UN lucky enough) for her to actually win in '08, Pres. Bush will no longer be in office? So, she intends to impeach an "ordinary citizen?" I'd like to see someone try to impeach her! Better yet, her campaign should fall as flat as her rhetoric!
Sheehan says, between sobs, that she is planning to run "for all the Iraqi and Afghan people killed in this terrible war." Right... those poor, dear innocents who killed her son? That makes sense, doesn't it? She wants to use her son's death to climb to fame and fortune and also use those who killed him as her excuse for running for office. Really smart. No contradictions there, huh, folks?
Her main purpose to unseat Nasty Pelosi is so that she can arrange to impeach Pres. Bush. Has anyone told her that if she's lucky enough (and the country is UN lucky enough) for her to actually win in '08, Pres. Bush will no longer be in office? So, she intends to impeach an "ordinary citizen?" I'd like to see someone try to impeach her! Better yet, her campaign should fall as flat as her rhetoric!
| 55 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog
Comment by youranter
youranter
Opinions
opinionatedranter
Tales From The Green Lantern
Comment by S.L. Bradish
Comment by Jim Stillman
Political Certainty
Comment by S.L. Bradish
Bush's only "crime" was defending America from very real enemies. The WMD's really did exist, we know this because they were used on Saddams own people (the Kurd village, remember?) and the UN, among others verified their existence. No war is perfect, Jim. Even WW1 and WW2 had problems. And they didn't end in a matter of months. They also weren't blessed with "exit stratedgies" in case you didn't know. We got into those wars for the long-run and for victory. Not for a little splash in the kiddie pool of war, planning to cut and run at the first sight of blood. It always amazes me how easily 9/11 has been ignored and forgotten while the real effort of fighting terrorists and their intention to kill everyone who isn't a strict Muslim doesn't seem important to the libs/dems.
People on both sides die in wars, Jim. Are you sorry that the Allies freed so many concentration camp prisoners? Or are you just sorry we freed 11 million Iraqis who got to vote for the first time?