Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
 
I am highly opinionated with a firm grip on the difference between right and wrong. I pay more attention to the candidates and the issues than to precise party lines. My facts are just that... FACTS- and my opinions are MY opinions- Regardless of what the subject, you can always find a good read on my blog, I write about various issues and not everything is focused on the subject of politics. I hope you enjoy!

Obama's Christianity (indeed)

June 28th 2008 16:43
Much ado has been made of Barack Obama and his quasi-religious beliefs. His "core religious principles" apparently consist of praying that nobody will notice how foolish he sounds while trying to convince us that he's a Christian. Even if he were to spit his feet out long enough to actually try to make sense, it wouldn't work. He approves of abortion and voted to prevent any survivors of partial birth abortions from staying alive. Regardless of whether you like the murder of the pre-born or not, can you honestly approve of intentionally killing a baby who has been delivered alive (in spite of the mother's wishes and the "doctors best efforts?") Obama voted in favor of it. I seem to recall something in the Bible about "Thou shalt not kill." In spite of his recent assertions that most people don't really read their Bibles (perhaps he means that the liberal Supreme Court hasn't yet "found" things in the Bible like what they "found" in the US Constitution). I'm sure he plans, as president, to see to it that the "appropriate changes" are made in the Bible, via his choices for the Supreme Court bench.

It wasn't that long ago that he spoke with disdain about middle Americans clinging to their guns and their Bibles, as they indulge in homophobic and xenophobic behavior. It seems pretty obvious that the Bibles he mentions in the hands of Americans aren't the same ones he pretends to read and follow.

"Christians for Obama" are no different than "Jews for Hitler" or "Infidels for Islam" or "Victims for Criminals" if you really think about it, folks.

Really Long Link

112
Vote


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
53 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Anonymous

June 28th 2008 17:41
Why can't someone be pro-choice and still be Christian? Because the Bible says so? It seems silly to me when somone cites the bible as the moral support for their argument, when the bible also endorses slavery, polygamy, and incest. Furthermore, it cracks me up that those yelling "Thou Shall not Kill" in response to abortion also yell "Fry Him" when it comes to capital punishment. But thats the beauty of the bible isn't it? Its full of clever contradictions...

Comment by S.L.

June 28th 2008 17:50
"An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" Anonymous. It was intended to make the punishment fit the crime. Those who kill innocent people (rapist/murderers, murder for hire or profit, serial killers, spree killers, etc.) should get the death penalty. Nowhere does it say that the death penalty is acceptable for the crime of being alive. Does this mean that you think it's all right to kill a child who happens to survive a partial birth abortion?

It is decidedly UN-Christian to approve of killing innocents for the convenience of others. Yes, you can take details out of context from the Bible and attempt to justify anything. But that doesn't make it right and it doesn't make Obama a real Christian.

Comment by Morgan Bell

June 28th 2008 17:59
hi S.L

He approves of abortion and voted to prevent any survivors of partial birth abortions from staying alive.

what did he actually vote on?

Comment by S.L.

June 28th 2008 18:05
It was a bill he voted on when he was in the Illinois state senate. It provided for medical care to save the life of any child that survived abortion. He voted to allow no one to do anything to save such a child. Since some babies manage to come out before the doctor can puncture their skulls and suck their brains out, I guess they had trouble deciding whether to kill them outright or not. So much for the argument that a child isn't really alive until it breathes air, right, Morgan? It sort of sounds like Obama has a streak of ice-cold cruelty in him, doesn't it?

Comment by Morgan Bell

June 28th 2008 19:01
apparently he objected to the particular wording, being a former constitutional law professor he saw wider implications in the specific terms
Really Long Link

but i do agree with you that Obama is undoubtedly pro-choice

have you seen this collection of quotes before?
Really Long Link

do you really think that being pro-choice prevents people from being considered christian?

Comment by S.L.

June 28th 2008 19:22
To begin with, Morgan, those quotes and his choice of words are well known. They are as hollow and empty as he is. Obama uses the standard "life of the mother" bulldookey to defend the indefensible. Not one woman, ever, has had her life saved by that horrific crime against humanity. If a pregnancy really needs to end in the last trimester, a caesarian section saves both the mother and the child. Partial birth abortion takes up to three days of shoving the baby out of the birth canal, turning it around (which is excruciatingly painful for both), cannot be done on an "emergency basis" (so as a desperate measure to save the mother it loses all credibility). The baby is caught by the ankles and pulled out, feet-first, hyperextending it's neck (and often breaking it) leaving the child with it's face covered but twitching while scissors are jambed into the back of it's skull and the brains sucked out. Nobody in their right mind could possibly fall for the assinine line about "saving the life of the mother."

As for the saline abortions, oh yeah they're so much nicer and gentler. The full term baby is scalded with saline as it's eyes mouth, throat, nose, etc. are burned. Sometimes they're still alive and squirming when they're "born." Of course, no one has to hear them scream, their throats are burned by the saline. The "mother" gets to feel her baby thrashing around as it suffers and dies so that she isn't inconvenienced by allowing it to live.

Do I think that anyone who supports such atrocious behavior can call themselves a Christian? Are you kidding? I don't they have any business calling themselves "human beings."

Comment by Lester Caudill

June 28th 2008 20:17
S.L. Obama is everything to everyone until after the election. That's when you will see the real Obama, and it will not be a pretty sight. As for him being a Christian his fruits tells on him, and God will Judge him for his sins, or would he say Allah.

Comment by S.L.

June 28th 2008 20:28
Whatever god he believes in, Lester, can't be a good one. Perhaps the name of Satan would be more accurate. His fruit all seems to come from a poison tree.

Comment by Anonymous

June 28th 2008 20:35
In the eyes of God aren't all souls equal? Isn't it a christian belief that one life isn't any more important or righteous than any other? Isn't it a christian belief that the only authority of God can judge human souls? How many death row inmates have been exonerated because of DNA technology? Think of the many innocents that have died because human judgement is flawed. I understand your argument for pro-life, but its laughable and a bit sadistic (not to mention hypocritical) to say some souls deserve death while others don't. After all, God loves us all doesn't he?

Comment by Anonymous

June 28th 2008 20:44
Furthermore, you think Obama is evil and worships Satan? LOL. I suppose you support our so CHRISTIAN president George W. Bush. A president who has lied his way into a war that has gotten thousands of Americans killed. A president who shuns the needs of the poor for the need of the wealthy. A president who supports torture and secret prisons. Hey, I can't remember, can you remind me, did Jesus approve of war? Did Jesus tell the poor 'tough luck, fend for youself'? Did Jesus torture Romans to save his people? I can't really remember because it seems like he must have since all you right wing christian nuts seem to think he did. Hey, dont forget, he also hated gays, immigrants, and muslims.

Comment by S.L.

June 28th 2008 20:49
God loves us all, and He created us all, Anonymous. Then free will kicks in and people can either do good or do bad. If your child tries to kill the new baby, do you tell him it's all right? Or do you punish him and try to prevent it from happening again? Would you intentionally have a child rapist babysitting your children? How would you like to have a serial killer move in next door to you? After all, God created them and He loves them, right? Does that mean that you think they should be free to continue to victimize others (yourself and your family included?) Or would you rather there was NO possibility of the monsters ever being freed to strike again?

DNA is really a gift from God, Anonymous. It convicts the guilty and exhonerates the innocent. If there is no doubt whatsoever that someone is guilty of heinous crimes, don't you think they should pay? Don't you believe they should never, ever be allowed to do it again? As long as they're alive, there is a chance that some idiot on a bench will turn them loose.

On the other hand, the totally innocent babies that are killed every day all over the world... God created them, too. And they have not chosen to do wrong. They are no threat to society. They are merely an inconvenience to selfish women and a profit for "hitmen m.d.'s"

Comment by Anonymous

June 28th 2008 20:58
I like how you claim to follow Chritian ideals, but skew a few details to make them your own. Remember, Judge not, lest ye be judged...

Comment by S.L.

June 28th 2008 20:59
Anonymous, do you own stock in a toilet paper company? You should, you know.

Bush didn't lie us into a war. Muslim's took our planes and killed 3000 innocent people. We fought back. Ever hear of 9/11?

Bush believes that kids need to learn to read ("No Child Left Behind") and get an education so they don't have to live in poverty. (Unlike the libs/dems who like to keep the poor folks down and begging and voting for them). Tell me, Anonymous, do you have a job? Do you work for a person who owns a company or a business? Or maybe you work for someone on welfare... It's the business owners who provide jobs, who keep the economy going. Not the Welfare State. Punitive taxes only make politicians feel important, they don't actually do good for anyone else.

Actually, you're a great example of a liberal, Anonymous. You obviously are ashamed of yourself and have to hide behind a misnomer (sort of like the liberals swearing that they're "centrists" because they're ashamed to admit how liberal they really are. )You make stupid accusations and hurl insults left and right, all to prove how "compassionate" you are, when you only care about being a good liberal and not the damage your failed philosophy does.

Comment by S.L.

June 28th 2008 21:02
Anonymous, you have every right and reason to hide your real name. Knowing the difference between right and wrong is not being judgmental. It's called having common sense but that's something you probably wouldn't understand.

Comment by Don Lee

June 28th 2008 21:41
Did you ever notice SL how the abortion lovers dont have any comments on how ugly and bad abortion is? All they can do is bash Bush. Talk about not being able to defend their so called choice.

Comment by S.L.

June 28th 2008 22:04
It's sickening, but not surprising, Don. The fans of abortion don't really like for people to understand what they support. They hide it behind "womens choice" or "women's rights" rather than come out and say that it means the brutal death of an innocent victim. They pretend it can erase the trauma of a rape (when it usually just makes it worse). They ignore the partial birth abortions and say they're rare when that isn't true (ask Dr. Tiller. He makes most of his substancial income from killing full term babies). They like to make believe that its a quick, pleasant, simple "procedure" rather than the horrible thing it really is. They switch from the reality of abortion to the fantasy of "choice" so they don't have to take a good look at what they suppport. They even like to pretend that pictures of aborted babies aren't real so they can deny it. Basically, all the "pro-choice" crowd are cold, cruel, selfish creatures who don't give a rats behind about anything but getting their own way. I pity them.

Comment by S.L.

June 28th 2008 22:17
Really Long Link
Here's a link to another Orble post that got a great deal of attention on the subject of abortion. For those of you who haven't seen it before, you might find it enlightening.

Comment by WOW!!

June 28th 2008 22:24
Just for the record, I am a (new voter) democrat and I had no idea that democrats were all pro-choice as I am not. I guess I'll be voting McCain but thanks for urging me to read up on this stuff before I made a mistake.

Comment by S.L.

June 28th 2008 22:27
No problem, Wow. Many people think the Democrats are still the good guys and have neever bothered to learn anything more. Good for you that you are thinking!

Comment by Obama is an Idiot

June 28th 2008 22:28
Any presidential candidate who supports the murder of babies is a bad choice... Oh, and I read that article when it came out SL... I LOVED it!!! I sent it around to a couple of others that WERE pro-choice... by the end of it they had changed their minds!!!! LOL- I wish it all could be that easy!

Comment by S.L.

June 28th 2008 22:34
Good for you "Obama is an Idiot". Too many people just don't understand what they're supporting. Most of them are horrified when the reality finally sinks in. Keep spreading the word!

Comment by Judge Not

June 29th 2008 00:02
As for "judging not, lest ye be judged" I believe that is taken out of context here. For those that actually read the bible know what that means. It means that the laws of God should be upheld... abortion falls under the murder category. If there is an issue or action that is not covered or commanded by God then we should not judge as to whether the action or issue is right or wrong. It is for God to decide what is righteous or wicked - not man. Since abortion is covered quite a bit in the bible that is something clearly wrong.

A further example would be for a vegetarian to say that others are wicked and sinful for eating meat. God din't say man should ONLY be vegetarian or ONLY be meat eaters... therefore it is wrong to start hating others for your own beliefs... that is judging others. It is breeding hate and spite for no other motive than to serve your own opinion and agenda. Again abortion is murder by medical, dictionary and biblical definition (to end life prematurely) and in the bible it refers to "life starts in the womb" as well as describing pregnant women as "being with child" etc. (as per SL's link provided in one of her comments) so it is obvious that God regards the unborn as children and most definitely LIFE.

When the word of God states clearly what is right or wrong and Christians agree and try to teach others it is not "judging" but educating as how Christian are supposed to behave.

Comment by S.L.

June 29th 2008 00:08
Thanks for the explanation, Judge Not. You're absolutely right!

Comment by Morgan Bell

June 29th 2008 04:59
saline abortions arent used on full-term babies they are used on a 16-24 week fetus and only account for 0.8% of cases in the USA

partial birth abortions account for 0.3% of cases, some are due to severe cases of a common fetal condition called hydrocephalus (fluid on the babies brain) where they would have died anyway and never gained consciousness, or to remove a fetus that has already died or is badly malformed or with serious genetic defect, not always just for the health of the mother

you are right in saying that ceasarian sections are another option in third trimester, but with ceasarians comes a greater risk of complications and a higher mortality rate of the mother

third trimester abortions should be limited to cases involving the potential death or serious disability of the woman, if doctors are performing late abortions where the fetus is healthy and the mother is not in danger they are doing the wrong thing

Comment by S.L.

June 29th 2008 05:15
Morgan, did you know that "Dr." Tiller (the baby killer, as he is widely known) does both types of abortions on healthy babies and mothers in their early teens. He violates the law by not reporting the underaged girls whose babies he kills. So the men who get them pregnant are running around free to do it again and again. If the terrible number of partial birth abortions done by "Dr." Tiller and his slimy ilk only account for 0.3% of all abortions, imagine how many healthy babies are killed every day by these monsters! He (and the others like him) are no better than murderers. His victims are generally healthy, by the way. Innocent and healthy.

Comment by Anne Tootill

June 29th 2008 06:45
SL, you sound like a very angry woman. You are one of those pro-lifers who scares me to death.

You believe so strongly that you are right and leave no room for debate.

You are unbelievable.




Comment by Lester Caudill

June 29th 2008 12:48
Anne, S.L. is one of those Pro-Lifers that believe strongly abortion is murder, she is not a angry woman, but she is a loving caring human being expressing her disgust with the way innocent children are being murdered everyday for no other reason, but some sorry excuse for a human being shirking their responsiblity.




Comment by S.L.

June 29th 2008 13:12
Thank you Lester! I really appreciate your support!!

Anne, sorry if I scare you, but the truth is you scare me. How many of your children did you kill because they were inconvenient? How many babies died because you changed your mind about letting them live?

If you answer with a number, it makes sense that you would be so intent on convincing others (and yourself) that killing children is acceptable behavior. If you answer by saying that you have never murdered one of your children, it makes me wonder how you could think it's such a good thing.

It's the liberal way, I guess, to concentrate on all the wrong things. Changing the names of victims to protect the murderers is one of their favorite ploys. Some people would have trouble taking the life of a fellow human being, but have no problem once the potential victim is renamed (such as "Nigger" or "Spic" or "Infidel", or "Fetus".) As long as the focus is on the perpetrator and the victim is ignored, they're happy. Does that describe you, Anne? Do you concentrate on the "choice" until you manage to forget that it's a human being who dies to give that "choice?"

Comment by Shout Politics

June 29th 2008 17:47
What about women who are victims of rape? Or women who cannot give birth because it would mean their death?

Comment by Norm

June 30th 2008 02:23
Oh, my godfather!

I'd like to see these mothers face the death penalty.




Comment by Cibbuano

June 30th 2008 02:42
you have a lot of criticism for liberals as they are 'pro-choice' and suggest that we support murder.

I don't think there's any rational being that loves the idea of abortion, as if killing babies is hilarious fun. No, it's a serious, emotionally-crippling scenario. It's a terrible thing for a woman to go through, and it's a scar you carry for life.

Why we are pro-choice is that, I think, we understand that, no matter what the law says, women are going to seek out abortions for a variety of reasons. In places where abortion is illegal, there are still huge numbers of the procedures.

For example, the BBC suggests that, in Brazil, where it is illegal, there are 1-2 million abortions every year, and Peru has a higher rate of abortion than the US, despite it being illegal.

All we are saying, as pro-choice supporters, is, let's give women the best possible medical care and the best possible education.

As for Obama's stance, I have to admit that, so far, I find it hard to disagree with him. Lately, I wonder if he'll stay on the mark.

As for McCain, in 1999, he said, on CNN, that he'd like to see Roe v Wade irrelevant, but "he does not support a repeal of Roe v Wade in the short or even long term"

Here's the link to McCain saying it.






Comment by S.L.

June 30th 2008 02:58
Hello Norm and Shout Politics. Thanks for the comments.

Cibbuano, do your beliefs in being pro-choice include the individual "rights" to smoke cigarettes in public? Just curious, most people who claim to be "pro-choice" limit that to the killing of pre-born children. On all their other pet peeves, they don't permit any choices at all. How about drug use? Shall we accompany users to the dealers and test the "products" to be sure they aren't contaminated before supplying sterile needles (just to make sure they're safe and protected, of course!) And what of kiddie pron? Isn't that also the "choice" of perverts to watch?Shall we have special, comfy little theatrers for them to indulge their fantasies? Maybe we could even let them have some of the babies who survived partial birth abortions to play with. After all, Obama says they aren't entitled to live if the "mother" wants them dead. Why not keep these surviving "unviable lumps of tissue" alive for the entertainment and exercise of "free choice" for pedophiles? My point here, Cibbuano, is that making sure that doing wrong is "safe, rare and legal" still doesn't make it right. Killing children is wrong. Period.

Since you haven't found anything wrong with Obama yet, I can only surmise that you haven't been paying much attention to what he says, and re-says, and alters, and doesn't know, and didn't know, and flat out lies about. Perhaps you'd not be so thrilled with him if you paid attention instead of allowing yourself to be mesmerized by his "silver tongue" and script writers.

Comment by Norm

June 30th 2008 03:03

Comment by S.L.

June 30th 2008 03:04
Norm? Are you praying or swearing?

Comment by S.L.

June 30th 2008 03:38
I hope you were praying, Norm. It works much better than swearing.

Comment by Norm

June 30th 2008 04:02

Comment by S.L.

June 30th 2008 04:15

Comment by alt_ed

June 30th 2008 06:02
God! You pro-lifers are so insane...

Abortion may not be the best solution when it comes to unwanted pregnancy, no matter what the scenario may be- but let’s look at some of the other ‘solutions’ shall we?

- the child is put up for adoption, due to complications during the birth (his mum was only 11) the child sustained permanent brain damage and disablement. Left to the state the find him a loving home, he ended up being permanently institutionalised on his 18birthday as a suitable home was never found.

- the child (a product of rape) is kept by her mother, sadly her mum wasn’t strong enough to cope with this trauma and the child is raised in a home where she was subjected to both physical and emotional abuse. This child then falls pregnant at a young age ant the cycle continues.

- the mother, despite her worsening health carries her child to full term. Both mother and child die during delivery and the family that could have been never has a chance.

Obviously, these are completely biased examples, and ultimately lack the sufficient evidence on my part to be taken too seriously… though I do feel that your persistent incoherent postings do call for a simplified reply!

Comment by Anonymous

June 30th 2008 06:46
I hate to pick on one denomination, but Obama's Congregationalist views go a long way towards shaping his theological and other important views in life.

He's entitled to them, but he's also got to realize that when he steps out in the public arena that's going to be a lot less impressed with his transcendental liberal New England mushy way of looking at things. He's got to be more specifically firm. While I might not agree with all the pounding he's getting from the likes of Jim Dobson, whom I believe to be extremely exclusivistic and narrow-minded in many ways, I'm not altogether happy with Obama's fuzzy wuzzy approach towards clear moral issues like abortion and embryonic stem cell research.

And I'm becoming more leery as to how he'll approach education issues in years to come given the ideological and pedagogical leanings of his supporters. Please, no more Barneys in the classrooms. When I hear liberals say "I'm for the kids" and use fuzzy logic, I see Barney sneaking in the classroom door.

And that' what many years of liberal New England Congregationalist thinking has led to. /s

Comment by S.L.

June 30th 2008 13:50
Hello alt_ed. Scenarios are such fun, aren't they? here are a few more to consider.

Baby is murdered and the mother dies of complications from the "procedure."

Baby is murdered and the mother is left sterile (after a hysterectomy). She remembers her one chance at motherhood when she grows up and how she murdered her only child. Goes crazy.

Baby is born healthy and turns out to be the greatest blessing her family could have hoped for.

The point is, alt_ed, when there's life, there's hope. The baby deserves to have a future. Your mother allowed you to be born, didn't she?

Comment by S.L.

June 30th 2008 14:04
Hi Steven. Obama's thinking is fuzzy on pretty much every issue. For one example that's insane, but typical... He doesn't want us to drill for oil, build new refineries or use nuclear energy because it could take years to have them up and running and won't help us right now. Instead, he wants everyone to go completely "green" and drive hybrids, use wind and solar power, increase mass transportation (in all 57 states), and stop depending on foreign oil. It's like he expects his ideas to spring to life on his command!

He's a fan of Affirmative Action, too and hasn't noticed that it usually fails those it was intended to "help." I wouldn't want to see him as the principal of a grade school, much less any higher office!

Comment by alt_ed

June 30th 2008 23:13
Well obviously she chose to have me S.L. but i wasn't a planned pregnancy... my sister had an abortion some time ago, though now has two healthy, lovely children.

She chose to abort one pregnancy because at that point in time she was not capable of raising a child in the situation she found herself in.

my point being abortion isn't right for everyone, and i don't think people should be 'forced' into it, BUT i do respect a woman's right to chose. my feelings are that the window of time in which an abortion can be performed could be lessened.

basically S.L. i just don't get your rational on many of the issues you pose here on orble. perhaps it is from your life experiences or lack of that contribute to your deadline and stale opinion.

Do you honestly believe your the model of a perfect moral beacon? I'm sure you've not ever done a 'thing' wrong in your life right? no regrets?


At the end of the day, and by your own omission you have said you hate woman that have abortions YET you have estranged yourself from your son? Why terminate and embryo eh, when you can have twice the fun turing your back on them post-birth! Oh the joys of motherhood

Comment by Anne Tootill

June 30th 2008 23:44

You had a shot at anonymous about hiding behind his name.

What's your real name SL?

Comment by S.L.

June 30th 2008 23:50
Hello alt_ed. First of all, I pity your sister, I don't hate her. But I pity more the child she killed.

No matter what sugar coating you use when you talk about abortion, you're still talking about the murder of an innocent child. Governments can give all sorts of "rights" to people, but only God has the right to decide who lives and who dies.

As for my "experience or lack of", I have grandchildren your age and have been through things that would curl your teeth, alt_ed. Maybe that's what makes me so determined to fight for the rights of those that society wants to throw away.

Have I made mistakes? Yes, everyone has. Killing your children doesn't solve the problem or erase the mistakes. It's a permanent solution to a temporary problem, just like suicide or killing someone because they made you angry. Maybe someday you'll understand that when you have a few more experiences.


Comment by S.L.

July 1st 2008 00:07
S.L. Bradish is my real name, Anne. It's how I sign my books, how I sign my checks, and how I sign the letters I write to friends and relatives.

What's your real name Anne?

Comment by alt_ed

July 1st 2008 00:24
S.L. are you confusing yourself with God perhaps? Do you really think if there is a God he would be proud with your behavior on earth?

I respect religion and peoples beliefs so long as those beliefs are not the basis for the governing state. I don't see how the bible is relevant in much of todays society, though do admire that it can provide strength to many in times of hardship.

S.L. if you pity my sister you are obviously to arrogant of mind to comprehend the decision she made. You're respect is what she deserves, and you her PITY!


Comment by Anne Tootill

July 1st 2008 00:37
SL, I went to your site and you didn't have SL Bradish on it, just SL.

Every post of mine on Orble shows my name Anne Tootill

Comment by S.L.

July 1st 2008 01:03
Something must have gotten changed without my knowing it, Anne. When I started the Orble site I used my whole name and it should still be there as I haven't changed it. I'll check it out.

As for you alt_ed, your sister still has my pity. I reserve respect for those who earn it. Not killing her first child would have been a thing worthy of respect. taking the easy way out wasn't. I have no illusions about being God, alt_ed. But I do believe in standing up for what is right and for the Bible. It's as relevant today as it has always been. Only those who prefer to flaunt it seem to find it irrelevant and out of place in the "modern world." God is very much alive, and He's watching all of us.

Comment by Anne Tootill

July 1st 2008 01:53
SL, We will have to agree to disagree on abortion. It's a terrible subject but one that has to be addressed in today's world.

I wish you would reach out to your sister who aborted her twins, she is just a mere mortal like the rest of us trying to get by as best she can. To deprive her of your company must have compounded her misery.

I really believe in love and forgiveness and the old addage that everyone deserves a second chance.






Comment by S.L.

July 1st 2008 01:57
Thanks, Anne, but I'm quite happy not having anything to do with my sister. She is not in any way, shape or form a nice person. Killing her twins was simply the last straw (added to a ton of others). With the exception of our youngest daughter (and her family) and my husbands father, we avoid our relatives like the plague.

Comment by alt_ed

July 1st 2008 02:10
Charity starts at home S.L. how can you preach of what you refuse to practice?

If you're writing was anymore a contradiction, you yourself would be a contraception

Comment by S.L.

July 1st 2008 02:26
Why doesn't it surprise me that you're not making any sense, alt_ed?

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
7 Posts
2 Posts
1 Posts
2211 Posts dating from October 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by S.L.
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]