Ignorance Paraded Again
February 28th 2008 14:32
Barak Obama has managed, once again, to prove how completely unqualified he is for the presidency. And, once again, his adoring fans appear to be ignoring it. Either that, or they're as oblivious as he is...
When asked if he'd still pull the troops out of Iraq immediately, he said he would. Proof of ignorance? Absolutely! But he wasn't content to stop there. He said that after pulling out the troops, if he discovered that al Qieda was in Iraq, he would return the troops to fight it. How incredibly stupid is that? They're already there. They have been there for years. Who does Obama think we're fighting, anyway? They're called terrorists and they have many other names as well.
He likes to pretend that al Qieda is only in Iraq because of President Bush. Really? Are they in several other countries because of him, too, Barak? Countries where we DON'T have troops? And regardless of why you think they're there, you just admitted that they ARE THERE, Barak. Can anyone be this dumb? And be so proud of it?
So, what does Mr. Obama expect to happen, I wonder. He moves into the White House, pulls the troops out of Iraq, gets them all home (which makes Silly Sheehan and her Code Stink critters very, very happy). Then he happens (probably by accident) to see a newscast about another suicide/homicide bomber in Iraq, blowing up 20 innocent civilians. He hears that Osama bin Laden has issued a new recording, urging his followers to continue killing infidels (including their own) and praises the most recent bomber. Now what? Our troops are disgraced (by his actions of removing them), they're disspirited by the defeat that was forced on them, and now he sends them back to do what? Finish the War on Terror and win it? Or just be good cannon fodder for President Obama, so he can put on a Clintonesque performance of giving a damn.
Perhaps there's another scenario... President Obama pulls out the troops (actually keeping a dem/lib promise is quite rare, of course) and takes Air Force One to the Middle East. He has a sit-down chat with Mahmoud Amadinejad and they become fast friends. Then Osama bin Laden contacts him and wants a visit as well. In an effort to keep another of his ridiculous promises, Pres. Obama agrees to the meeting and invites him onto Air Force One for the chat...
A few days later, Vice President Hillary Clinton tearfully orders that Air Force One be shot down since bin Laden and a dozen terrorists have high-jacked it and are planning to crash it into the White House.
When asked if he'd still pull the troops out of Iraq immediately, he said he would. Proof of ignorance? Absolutely! But he wasn't content to stop there. He said that after pulling out the troops, if he discovered that al Qieda was in Iraq, he would return the troops to fight it. How incredibly stupid is that? They're already there. They have been there for years. Who does Obama think we're fighting, anyway? They're called terrorists and they have many other names as well.
He likes to pretend that al Qieda is only in Iraq because of President Bush. Really? Are they in several other countries because of him, too, Barak? Countries where we DON'T have troops? And regardless of why you think they're there, you just admitted that they ARE THERE, Barak. Can anyone be this dumb? And be so proud of it?
So, what does Mr. Obama expect to happen, I wonder. He moves into the White House, pulls the troops out of Iraq, gets them all home (which makes Silly Sheehan and her Code Stink critters very, very happy). Then he happens (probably by accident) to see a newscast about another suicide/homicide bomber in Iraq, blowing up 20 innocent civilians. He hears that Osama bin Laden has issued a new recording, urging his followers to continue killing infidels (including their own) and praises the most recent bomber. Now what? Our troops are disgraced (by his actions of removing them), they're disspirited by the defeat that was forced on them, and now he sends them back to do what? Finish the War on Terror and win it? Or just be good cannon fodder for President Obama, so he can put on a Clintonesque performance of giving a damn.
Perhaps there's another scenario... President Obama pulls out the troops (actually keeping a dem/lib promise is quite rare, of course) and takes Air Force One to the Middle East. He has a sit-down chat with Mahmoud Amadinejad and they become fast friends. Then Osama bin Laden contacts him and wants a visit as well. In an effort to keep another of his ridiculous promises, Pres. Obama agrees to the meeting and invites him onto Air Force One for the chat...
A few days later, Vice President Hillary Clinton tearfully orders that Air Force One be shot down since bin Laden and a dozen terrorists have high-jacked it and are planning to crash it into the White House.
| 48 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog
Comment by Anonymous
However to cater to your feeble mind let me elaborate, Obama says Al-Qaeda is in Iraq only because the US army is, and he's absoloutely right. Saddam was no fan of Al-Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden has more than once referred to how the US rules the middle east through proxy governments, he's pointed at Saddam Hussein and the Saudi Monarchy as two prime examples. As such Al-Qaeda was a big threat to Saddam and because of this he kept such people out of the country and would have fought a war against Al-Qaeda should they ever tried to have invaded.
This principle extends throughout the middle east, why do you think Al-Qaeda is in pakistan? Because in their eyes Musharaf is as American as George Bush, and they're right, he's amilitary dictator with the support of the US government. He would be as tyrannical as saddam hussein if he were given the chance, he certainly has his parrelels with that man.
Having said that wherever Al-Qaeda is is absoloutely irrelevant. Where the US is however is relevant because Al-Qaeda groes more and more powerful the more the US gets involved overseas. It's that simple, Al-Qaeda is now so large and covers so many groups of people that it is now virtually impossible to attack it through military means as the US army is not well equipped to handle a guerilla force and any attempts to attack it only ends with it being stronger.
If you want Al-Qaeda to be weakened you take away their case for existence, but to do that you have to be brave enough to admit that the US was careless, that Ronald Regan was wrong to support the Mujahideen back in Afghanistan during the war against the soviets, that George Bush was wrong to invade Iraqin an effort to destroy al-qaeda.
In the end you've already lost the war, the more you fight al-qaeda the stronger it becomes, right now it's taking on the most powerful military force on earth and is only getting stronger each passing day. It can just as easily be destroyed as it was created but bombs aren't the key here.
Comment by S.L. Bradish
Radical Islam has been known for the dispicable, cowardly murderers they are for well over a century. President Bush didn't create them. Bill Clinton DID encourage them by letting them get away with repeated assaults.
So you go ahead, Anonymous "sweetheart" and pretend that Obama knows what he's talking about, keep blaming Bush for al Qieda, and enjoy your fantasy life until they blow you up.