Blind Currency
December 1st 2006 13:16
I've been hearing a lot lately about the government changing our money to allow the blind to be able to read it. On the surface, it sounds like a kind and compassionate thing to to and probably has a whole lot of supporters. Personally, I think it's ridiculuous! Hold on a minute. I'm not an insensitive jerk! Blind people have been around as long as money has, haven't they? Blindness is a tragedy that happens to young and old and from a variety of reasons. I have no wish to make things harder on them. However, the money we use has never been printed in Braille so not doing it now should make no difference. Consider this, folks... How do the deaf hear? How do paraplegics get around? Did the government build their wheelchairs and hearing aids? Nope. How about a little good old ingenuity to solve the problem? Why should the government have to take back all the currency, reprint more millions in Braille, and raise our taxes to accomplish something unnecessary? Nevada casinos have slot machines that "read" bills without them being in Braille. If the technology exists to "read" bills for gambling machines, it can surely be used to "read" money for the blind. I can picture a small device that can be carried in a purse or pocket and easily used to identify the denomination of paper bills. Before anyone out there gets the idea that it would be too expensive, think about so many of the inexpensive things we use every day and what they once cost (when they were new to the market.) Everything from coffee makers to computers started out horrifically pricey. Everyone who wants one now can get it! If a technology company got hold of the idea to create money readers for the blind, believe me, it wouldn't take long until the product was on the market! It would certainly be quicker and more efficient than expecting the government to do it. And our taxes wouldn't be increased to pay for it. So, how about it, folks? Any inventors out there?
| 52 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog







Comment by youranter
youranter
Opinions
opinionatedranter
Tales From The Green Lantern
Comment by youranter
youranter
Opinions
opinionatedranter
Tales From The Green Lantern
Comment by S.L.Bradish
Comment by Damo
Australia has done away with all paper produced notes and replaced them with plastic note. This was considered to be a radical and potentially dangerous act when it was first pioneered. Yet plasitic note have several advantages over old paper note. The are much harder to copy or reproduce. They last much longer than paper notes. They are stonger and are much more difficult to tear. Waterproof. Unlike paper notes the surface can be etched to allow marking to be added to assist the blind. Yet the real driving force for the change was financial. Changing to plastic notes made the net cost of note production cheaper. The bottom line is that Paper Notes will go the way of the steam engine, loved by romantics but impractical to the modern world.
A machine to read note is fine if every blind person is issued with one but poverty may prevent some and flat batteries may prevent others.
Coins have long been designed to cater for people with poor eyesight, not just the legally blind, by being different sizes and weights. The original Australian 50c coin was changed from being roind to multisided after it became confised with the 20c coin. $1 and $2 notes were replaced with gold coins. 1c and 2c coins are no longer produced as they cannot buy anything these days.
Comment by S.L.Bradish
Comment by youranter
youranter
Opinions
opinionatedranter
Tales From The Green Lantern
Comment by Damo
The bottom line reason for changing the Australian currency was financial. New note are printer to replace old notes and this costs money. Plastic notes simply last longer and costs are reduced. Less tax dollars waisted. This technology has been exported to a number of other nations who see the practicality of going plastic
Here is a quote from the Note Printing Australia website.
" NPA has also produced polymer notes for Thailand, Papua New Guinea, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, Singapore, Brunei, Indonesia, Kuwait, Samoa, New Zealand, Romania, Bangladesh, Solomon Islands, Mexico, Nepal, Vietnam, and Chile."
I think it is worth researching it viability.
http://www.noteprinting.com/banknotes_standard.html
Your text goes here
Comment by S.L.Bradish
Comment by S.L.Bradish
Comment by Lil John.
$1
$5
$10
$20
$50
$100
By simply adding a thin trnasparent coat of some sort of plastic to one of 6 identifiable places on the current bills, a blind preson could indentify the bill without having to redesign it. Bills typically last 18 months in circulation before being too worn to use anymore... so simply introducing the plasticized bills into the equation will solve the problem with minimal cost in a reasonable period of time. The best answers are often found in the most unliikely places.
Comment by S.L.Bradish
Comment by S.L.Bradish
Comment by Adrienne
Comment by S.L.Bradish